<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: foo_w7shell 0.2.8.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wintense.com/381/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wintense.com/381</link>
	<description>Tools, plugins and other cool stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coren</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Coren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-500</guid>
		<description>With foobar 1.0 support was added for custom artwork paths. I&#039;ve set up this feature to work with my own collection (in my case, the artwork filename is always &#039;(&#039;%date%&#039;)&#039; %album%.jpg) and it works fine in foobar. However, the artwork still doesn&#039;t show up in the Win7 shell with this plugin.
Could you perhaps update it to take advantage of this new feature in foobar 1.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With foobar 1.0 support was added for custom artwork paths. I&#8217;ve set up this feature to work with my own collection (in my case, the artwork filename is always &#8216;(&#8216;%date%&#8217;)&#8217; %album%.jpg) and it works fine in foobar. However, the artwork still doesn&#8217;t show up in the Win7 shell with this plugin.<br />
Could you perhaps update it to take advantage of this new feature in foobar 1.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kejml</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Kejml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-497</guid>
		<description>How can I turn-off thumbnail? I want only progress indicator in taskbar for Windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I turn-off thumbnail? I want only progress indicator in taskbar for Windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeljko</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeljko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Could you please add volume control?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please add volume control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bakaneko</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>bakaneko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Hi. I have serious problems with plugin. With w7shell foobar takes around 2 minutes to start (1-2 sec without it). If I remove all playlist (~30 of them) start time becomes reasonable. Adding/removing playlist takes 1-2 seconds (instant without w7shell).
Win7x64, foobar2000 0.9.6.9 (though it is same for the latest beta).

PS Sorry for my English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I have serious problems with plugin. With w7shell foobar takes around 2 minutes to start (1-2 sec without it). If I remove all playlist (~30 of them) start time becomes reasonable. Adding/removing playlist takes 1-2 seconds (instant without w7shell).<br />
Win7x64, foobar2000 0.9.6.9 (though it is same for the latest beta).</p>
<p>PS Sorry for my English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunyi Nyufi</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunyi Nyufi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Understandable, it&#039;s you&#039;re work after all, do it the way you like it :) (I still might switch to foobar2000 anyway XD)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understandable, it&#8217;s you&#8217;re work after all, do it the way you like it <img src='http://wintense.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  (I still might switch to foobar2000 anyway XD)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pieceofsummer</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>pieceofsummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to write artist, title or other things on a preview thumbnail. It&#039;s not a competition with win7shell and I have no desire for supporting &lt;strong&gt;everything&lt;/strong&gt;. I have my own vision on how it should look and work, and switching users from other players to foobar2000 is not by goal :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to write artist, title or other things on a preview thumbnail. It&#8217;s not a competition with win7shell and I have no desire for supporting <strong>everything</strong>. I have my own vision on how it should look and work, and switching users from other players to foobar2000 is not by goal <img src='http://wintense.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunyi Nyufi</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunyi Nyufi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-321</guid>
		<description>As maddox said, it would be nice, if the artist and title of the currently played track was written on the preview thumbnails, like &lt;a href=&quot;http://i37.tinypic.com/a2srx1.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Win7shell does for Winamp&lt;/a&gt;. If it did, I would switch from Winamp to foobar2000 ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As maddox said, it would be nice, if the artist and title of the currently played track was written on the preview thumbnails, like <a href="http://i37.tinypic.com/a2srx1.png" rel="nofollow">Win7shell does for Winamp</a>. If it did, I would switch from Winamp to foobar2000 <img src='http://wintense.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparanoid</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparanoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I tried a fresh portable installation, added this componet, then created a new blank playlist, it&#039;s lagged about 1 sec, and added about 6000 tracks, quit foobar and restarted, it&#039;s slow :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried a fresh portable installation, added this componet, then created a new blank playlist, it&#8217;s lagged about 1 sec, and added about 6000 tracks, quit foobar and restarted, it&#8217;s slow <img src='http://wintense.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pieceofsummer</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>pieceofsummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-272</guid>
		<description>skitchbeatz, the glitch with artwork centering is actually a Windows bug. 
Try turning on the foobar&#039;s window transparency (it may stay fully opaque, only the fact of transparency matters), it should almost completely remove that strange glitch.

And what&#039;s with the ability to display artwork? Are there some messages in console?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skitchbeatz, the glitch with artwork centering is actually a Windows bug.<br />
Try turning on the foobar&#8217;s window transparency (it may stay fully opaque, only the fact of transparency matters), it should almost completely remove that strange glitch.</p>
<p>And what&#8217;s with the ability to display artwork? Are there some messages in console?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pieceofsummer</title>
		<link>http://wintense.com/381/comment-page-1#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>pieceofsummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wintense.com/?p=381#comment-271</guid>
		<description>Sparanoid, thanks for feedback.
Are you sure the plugin is an issue? Actually I didn&#039;t tested it on a large amount of songs, but I don&#039;t see any reason for it running so slow.
I&#039;ll try to repro this behavior when I have a chance. And could you please also try this on an empty foobar configuration just with the only foo_w7shell installed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sparanoid, thanks for feedback.<br />
Are you sure the plugin is an issue? Actually I didn&#8217;t tested it on a large amount of songs, but I don&#8217;t see any reason for it running so slow.<br />
I&#8217;ll try to repro this behavior when I have a chance. And could you please also try this on an empty foobar configuration just with the only foo_w7shell installed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
